How far should a state have a right to monitor the actions of people within its borders?(gce/2007)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog Archive
Labels
media
technology
youth culture
society
culture
new mass media
crime
law
guns
violence
family
education
children
guns violence
leadership and governence
shame
Sports
TOBY
art
censorship
class
discrimination
evil
gender
globalisation
glogster
meritocracy
morality
new media
privacy
quiz
sample
society.
A state is incessantly bogged down with the herculean responsibility to be able to manage their people and their doings. It is after all the state’s inhabitants that accentuate societal growth and development. In that bid it remains essential that the state upholds the task of managing its people as the actions of the inhabitants can variably dissolve societal values and ethics, in the form of crimes and illegal activites. For centuries it has been witnessed that the state has the responsibility of their citizen’s welfare. In doing so, they are required to kick the anomalies to the curb. The anomalies refer to political prisoners, criminals, drug lords and cartel movers that are capable of destabilizing known systems and making a mockery out of upholding a morally upright society. It remains the state’s duty to preserve their sovereignty by ensuring that the propensity of these uprisings and felonies are reduced, if not totally abolished. This duty requires the state to have the right to monitor the actions of their people within its borders to nip these eminent predicaments in the bud.
ReplyDelete